The Supreme Court on
Monday directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the Karur
stampede, which claimed 41 lives on September 27. A bench comprising Justices
JK Maheshwari and NV Anjaria appointed former apex court judge Ajay Rastogi to
lead a three-member committee that will oversee the investigation.
The order follows
petitions by BJP leaders Uma Anandan and GS Mani seeking a CBI probe. Tamil
actor Vijay’s party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), also demanded an
independent investigation under Supreme Court supervision, citing concerns over
impartiality if only Tamil Nadu Police officers were involved.
The Supreme Court had
reserved its order on the TVK plea on October 10, after the TVK opposed the
Madras High Court’s formation of a special investigation team (SIT) composed
solely of state police officers. The party alleged that the stampede might have
involved a pre-planned conspiracy and objected to the court’s remarks
suggesting the actor-politician and his party abandoned the site and showed no
remorse.
Police stated that the rally drew about 27,000 attendees, nearly
three times the expected 10,000. They blamed a seven-hour delay by Vijay in
reaching the venue for the mishap on September 27. Senior advocates for the TVK
argued that the high court acted prematurely and made adverse comments without
hearing the parties.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the state, defended
the SIT, noting that the officers were known for their integrity. The Supreme
Court had earlier questioned why a single bench in Chennai acted while a
division bench in Madurai was hearing related matters.
Two families affected by the Karur stampede alleged they were
misled into signing Supreme Court petitions seeking a CBI probe, believing the
papers were meant to secure compensation and jobs.
Sharmila, mother of a 9-year-old victim, said her husband had
abandoned them years ago, so she signed the documents thinking to use the
compensation. Daily-wage earner P Selvaraj said he signed the documents after
his wife’s death in the tragedy, unaware that the petitions requested a CBI
investigation.
The Tamil Nadu Digital Journalists Union (TNDJU) alleged fraud
and misrepresentation, claiming key petitions were filed without the free,
informed, and voluntary consent of the petitioners.
In a petition to the Supreme Court on October 12, the union
called for suo motu action to investigate the alleged malafide filings, verify
all related records, ensure advocates-on-record complied with due diligence
rules, and initiate disciplinary or contempt proceedings if necessary to
preserve the integrity of judicial processes.