The
Supreme Court on Tuesday said bar councils in Punjab and Haryana indulged in
"shameful acts" and "malpractices" apart from "massive
corruption".
A
bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh said if a need arose it would
constitute a special investigation team to look into their affairs and check
the bank accounts of bar bodies especially in Haryana.
"The
offices and chambers of lawyers of these state bar councils have become a hub
of property dealers and corruption. They are indulging in all kinds of shameful
acts and malpractices. It has come to our notice and we will not leave them
lightly. They have brought disrepute to the profession," the bench said.
The
bench was hearing a plea of an advocate challenging his disqualification from
contesting Karnal Bar Association elections.
It
issued notice to the bar bodies and sought assistance of senior advocate RS
Cheema, who is member of the Karnal Bar Association and asked him to suggest
names of some other senior, reputed lawyers, who could temporarily hold the
position of the bar body.
Senior
advocate Narender Hooda, appearing for the lawyer, said the returning officer
without any vote being cast declared the candidates in fray as elected as
unopposed by sitting outside the voting centre.
Advocate
Sandeep Chaudhary, who was disqualified from contesting the election of
district bar body, said it violated his rights as an advocate.
Hooda
said his client was barred from contesting the election, pending constitution
of an enquiry committee over the allegation of misappropriation of funds.
Chaudhary
filed an appeal in the Bar Council of India, which stayed his order of
disqualification. However, a plea against the BCI order was filed before the
high court, which set aside the relief to Chaudhary on February 27.
Hooda
said the election was held on the next day and a new returning officer, who
went to the voting centre, declared all four other candidates as elected unopposed.
Justice
Surya Kant observed these bar councils, particularly the Haryana State Bar
Council, had become a "shameful association".
When Hooda referred to the allegations against
Chaudhary, Justice Surya Kant said, "These allegations may be correct… We
have no doubt at all in our mind that all these office bearers are involved in
such shameful acts and bringing disrepute to the profession. I have seen so
many district bars associations, they are indulging in all kinds of
malpractices and corruption. The Government of Haryana has pampered them. These
chambers of advocates have become all addas of property dealers. No serious
professional is sitting there." The bench asked Cheema to devote some time on the
next hearing and allowed him to attend virtually to suggest some names of
senior lawyers, who could temporarily handle the post of office bearers in the
bar body. The matter would come up on April 15.