New
Delhi :
The Supreme Court on Friday sought responses from the Centre and Twitter India
on a plea seeking a mechanism for regulating content and advertisements
spreading hatred through fake news and instigative messages via bogus accounts.
A
bench of Chief Justice SA Bobde and justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian
issued notice to the Centre and Twitter Communication India on the plea filed
by one Vinit Goenka, which said there are hundreds of fake Twitter handles and
bogus Facebook accounts in the name of eminent people and high dignitaries.
Advocate
Ashwini Dubey, appearing for Goenka, said directions are needed for
establishing a mechanism to regulate hateful content on the social networking
site.
The
bench said that it is issuing notice in the matter and tagging the plea with
other pending matters. The plea filed through Dubey said, “These fake Twitter
handles and Facebook accounts use real photo of constitutional authorities and
eminent citizens. Therefore, common man relies upon the messages published from
these Twitter handles and Facebook accounts.”
The
PIL said that fake news is the root cause of many riots, including the one in
Delhi earlier this year, and bogus accounts are used to promote casteism and
communalism which endangers fraternity and unity of the country.
“It
is submitted that presently total number of Twitter handles in India is around
35 million and total number of Facebook accounts is 350 million and experts
says that around 10 percent Twitter handles (3.5 million) and 10 percent
Facebook accounts (35 million) are duplicate/bogus/fake,” the plea said.
Political
parties use fake social media accounts for self-promotion and image building
and to tarnish the image of opponents and contesting candidates, especially
during the elections, the plea submitted.
The
plea has also sought directions to make a law as per which an action can be
initiated against Twitter and their representatives in India for willfully
abetting and promoting anti India tweets and penalise them.
The
petition further said that a representation to the authority concerned to act
in accordance with the law of the country against social media giant Twitter
was filed but no action has been taken so far by authorities concerned.
It
also pointed out that the Ministry of Home Affairs has banned Sikhs for Justice
(SFJ) under the Unlawful Activities and Prevention Act on July 10, 2019, yet it
continues to have an active presence on Twitter and allegedly espouses hatred,
terrorism, and sedition, criminal acts.
“The
logic and algorithms that Twitter uses should be shared and vetted by Indian
government authorities or competent authority for screening anti-India
tweets... KYC of all social media handles in India must be conducted for making
social media safe and accountable and traceable,” the plea said.
___________